Certified in Public Health (CPH) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Certified in Public Health (CPH) Test with quizzes and flashcards. Each question comes with hints and explanations. Prepare thoroughly for your CPH exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

Which of the following is a moral argument supporting the restriction of cigarette advertising to children?

Children and adolescents below the age of consent need protection
The public needs protection
Nicotine has addictive power
Advertising is manipulative

The correct answer is: Children and adolescents below the age of consent need protection

The moral argument for supporting the restriction of cigarette advertising to children lies in the need for protection of vulnerable populations. Children and adolescents are not fully capable of understanding the long-term consequences of smoking or the persuasive intent of advertising. This demographic is particularly impressionable, making it essential to safeguard them from the potential harms of tobacco marketing, which could lead to early initiation of smoking and subsequent addiction. By prioritizing the protection of minors, society acknowledges their limited ability to make informed decisions regarding tobacco use. This perspective aligns with broader ethical principles concerning childhood rights and welfare, emphasizing that it is a collective responsibility to shield young individuals from influences that may lead to detrimental health behaviors. Providing this protection not only supports the moral imperative of safeguarding children's well-being but also promotes public health by reducing the likelihood of tobacco-related diseases later in life.